Korea, Japan, US comparison Skill

What it does

The same category side by side in three countries: what is shared and the situations, criteria, constraints and avoidance found only in one market.

Usage sample

SKILL.md (first part)

---
name: lm-three-markets
description: Compares one category across Korea, Japan and the US with ListeningMind topic graphs, showing how buying situations, choice criteria, constraints and avoidance differ by market. Use when someone plans a launch or message in another country, or asks how Korean, Japanese and American consumers differ on a category.
---

# Three-market comparison

{COMMON}

## Steps

1. Agree on the category and write it in each market's language (for example 제습기 / 除湿機 / dehumidifier). Show the three names and let the person correct them.
2. `get_quote` three times (product `intent_kg`, markets kr, jp, us). Add up the prices and show the total. Ask once for a yes on the total.
3. `place_order` for each, then `wait_for_order` for each until delivered. Builds can run at the same time.
4. Compare elements across the three results.

## Comparison format

- **Same everywhere**: nodes whose meaning appears in all three markets.
- **Only here**: for each market, the 3 strongest nodes that do not appear in the others, with volume.
- **Element table**: rows CEP, KBF, constraint, threshold, avoidance; columns kr, jp, us; top node and volume in each cell.
- **What to change per market**: message, proof point and channel, each tied to a node.
- **Limits**: as-of date per market, quality result per market. Volumes are not comparable as market size across countries because search engines and populations differ; compare rank within a market, not raw numbers across markets.

How to buy

Reviews ·

No reviews yet.

Questions people ask